1 |
Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 |
2 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level |
10 |
> > (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like this? |
11 |
> > In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being a bad |
12 |
> > thing that we have the warning, but i also don't see a point in |
13 |
> > changing the entire tree to get rid of 3000 bytes, esp. since the |
14 |
> > ChangeLog entries added to the tree will add at least 30,000 bytes |
15 |
> > :) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to |
19 |
> repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman |
20 |
> 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning? IIRC at least one of the QA |
21 |
> team members is so tired of the warnings that they want to make every |
22 |
> single one of them errors; the --nonag option would allow those |
23 |
> warnings to remain in repoman (ie to help guide new dev's or non-dev's |
24 |
> using repoman on their local repos) but since they don't relate to |
25 |
> actual technical breakage they can just be turned off during QA runs, etc. |
26 |
|
27 |
Just don't. I think you missed the point hard and I don't want to know |
28 |
where the ricochet ended. |
29 |
|
30 |
First of all, the QA's issue is not really about verbosity of repoman. |
31 |
It's more about developers who ignore repoman output and commit broken |
32 |
ebuilds which QA needs to fix afterwards. '--nonag' would mean that |
33 |
some developers will introduce even more warnings for others... |
34 |
|
35 |
Secondly, AutoRepoman is already filtering repoman's output. If Patrick |
36 |
disliked a particular warning, he'd filter it already. He doesn't need |
37 |
easy-available repoman option for that. |
38 |
|
39 |
Thirdly, I'm pretty sure I had a third argument but I forgot what it |
40 |
was. But it was totally convincing, I'm sure of it. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Best regards, |
44 |
Michał Górny |