Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:26:42
Message-Id: 20070716232113.65b2f5a1@terciopelo.krait.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors by Wernfried Haas
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:08:31 +0200
5 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
8 > > I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it.
9 >
10 > Proctors have already been removed in the last council meeting.
11 > As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is
12 > and if anyone is supposed to enforce it atm (devrel? userrel?).
13
14 I am sure not devrel. That's one reason we had proctors to begin
15 with. Council, I guess.
16 >
17 > cheers,
18 > Wernfried
19 >
20 > --
21 > Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
22 > Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
23 > forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
24 > #gentoo-forums (freenode)
25 Wernfried, regards,
26
27 - --
28 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
29 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (GNU/Linux)
32
33 iD8DBQFGm/1pQa6M3+I///cRAhHkAJ9Ooi4ey+bsAg9cONKbA+PxJryC3ACfZ4xz
34 oYJUpkqvVBy4nF3LcbVKOV8=
35 =mLhy
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o>