Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:58:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 51BC9D1A.5070906@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | On 06/15/2013 06:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have |
| 4 | > implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS |
| 5 | > to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Right, that's why my quote from the council log does not make sense. |