| 1 |
On 19/11/16 19:04, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Could we maybe include some place (metadata.xml?) to state what is |
| 3 |
> the best way to test a package? I'm thinking it could include things |
| 4 |
> like: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> - whether the test of the package are reliable, |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> - whether runtime testing is required and what kind of, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> - how likely it is that revdeps need to be checked. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> For example, in LLVM I would like to ask arch testers to always check |
| 13 |
> a few common clang calls. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'd really like to collect information like this in a machine-readable |
| 17 |
format, but it would be tricky to get right. |
Archives