Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@×××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:45:52
Message-Id: 20210806034548.C1677E0921@pigeon.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation by Alec Warner
1 > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > > We've been collecting more and more container related packages in
4 > > app-emulation/*
5
6 > > What do you think about finally moving those packages to separate category?
7
8 > As always my opinion is that:
9
10 > (a) Categories were a design mistake.
11 > (b) The mistake is hard to fix.
12 > (c) It's basically low-value to try to 'correctly' categorize packages
13 because of A.
14 > (d) Recategorizing means a bunch of stuff has to be updated.
15
16 > Do people actually care what category things are in? I just use
17 > --search or eix or whatever and the category is just this...bad
18 > concept we attach to packages for silly historical reasons..
19
20 -A
21
22 Gentoo portage has an awful lot of categories.
23
24 In contrast, Void Linux has all packages not subdivided into categories.
25
26 I counted for FreeBSD ports, 63 categories; pkgsrc, 48 categories (NetBSD, but ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix OSes).
27
28 My count could have been just slightly off.
29
30 I count 165 for Gentoo, could be slightly off.
31
32 I count 61 for Arbor, from Exherbo.
33
34 I count 125 categories for Haiku ports, which is modeled after Gentoo but not nearly as many packages.
35
36 Tom