1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> No, what I actually say is *why* things don't work, and if it hasn't |
4 |
> already been explained, I say how to fix it. |
5 |
Oh? Where on Earth did you do that in this thread? All you've said so far is |
6 |
that preserve-libs is "an awful hack that doesn't really work, is |
7 |
conceptually unsound and that breaks all kinds of things in subtle ways." No |
8 |
reasoning given whatsoever. Nor any indication of how to fix anything. |
9 |
|
10 |
I wouldn't mind your snobbish attitude so much, if you did actually present |
11 |
full and cogent reasoning, the *first* time you "present" an issue. But you |
12 |
never do, you simply state cryptically that things are broken, and if anyone |
13 |
queries you, you usually state that the reason others don't see it, is |
14 |
because they are stupid. (That's what your arguments boil down to.) |
15 |
|
16 |
> But the first step towards |
17 |
> getting something fixed is admitting that there's a problem, and you've |
18 |
> always been awfully reluctant to do that until the damage has already |
19 |
> been done. |
20 |
> |
21 |
Yes, it is hard to admit one has problems; how are things going with your |
22 |
human interaction problems? (They don't seem to be going that well, given |
23 |
your continued attitude.) I mean, you have admitted to yourself that you do |
24 |
have issues in that area, haven't you? After the last 8 or 9 years of being |
25 |
told you do, including by people who call you a friend, you *must* have |
26 |
taken that on-board as a problem _you_ need to address by now, surely? |
27 |
Especially after all the damage that's been caused. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |