Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 01:07:07
Message-Id: 20050507010724.GP13705@exodus.wit.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager by Brian Jackson
1 On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:12:07AM -0500, Brian Jackson wrote:
2 > Okay, I'll stop shooting. But I suggest that this is a particular GLEP
3 > where a reference implementation (outside of the main portage tree)
4 > would aid people in studying the GLEP. The GLEP workflow section allows
5 > for this. I'd say at least a standard emerge system should be working
6 > before this GLEP is approved.
7 The Glep is a ways off from being approved imo, since still have a
8 fair amount of ramnifications to nail down. Ciaranm's home request is
9 valid, so that bit should at least be nailed down requirements wise,
10 before proceeding...
11
12 Re: implementation, the bug referenced on the glep actually holds
13 patches in already in use by haubi. Would be good to bundle it up
14 into a tarball (imo) for easier testing however...
15 ~brian
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list