| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 |
| 4 |
> and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to |
| 5 |
> hearing Qt team opinion. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Maybe. But you'll have to convince me. We aren't planning on writing |
| 8 |
the qt5 equivalent of qt4-r2.eclass; qmake-utils.eclass should |
| 9 |
suffice. Therefore I don't see much usefulness in a "glue" eclass such |
| 10 |
as the one you're proposing. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In any case, this is completely off-topic. Please start a separate |
| 13 |
discussion or open a bug. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thanks, |
| 16 |
Pesa |
Archives