| 1 |
hi ! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > I'd like to propose that programs should almost always install in /usr |
| 4 |
> > rather than /usr/X11R6. My reasons follow: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> First of all, I want to enlighten people not used to BSD that there is |
| 7 |
> another way. BSDs (at least NetBSD, think the others does this too) |
| 8 |
> installes everything not in the base-system in it's own directory |
| 9 |
> (/usr/pkg/ on NetBSD). This is a nice solution IMHO since it keeps /usr |
| 10 |
> "clean". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
imho, just put everything in /usr, unless you _want_ |
| 13 |
different versions/flavours of the same program |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > (3) Simplicity in the ebuilds. Consider the following scenarios: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Yes, this is the reason I think is worse the most. I really don't like |
| 18 |
> the install-in-different-paths-depending-on-whats-it-linked-against. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> This is the same with GNOME. Like XChat, if it's compiled |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
yep, and i'm thinking about cdrdao here. |
| 23 |
i really would like to forget about the /opt -stuff, |
| 24 |
but i assume it has to be retained since FHS says so. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Regards, |
| 27 |
> Mikael Hallendal |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
ciao |
| 30 |
peter |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 33 |
Peter Kadau <peterdotkadauatwebdotde> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
"Why program by hand in five days what you can |
| 36 |
spend five years of your life automating ?" |
| 37 |
----------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 38 |
______________________________________________________________________________ |
| 39 |
Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! |
| 40 |
Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 |
Archives