| 1 |
On Sat, 2022-03-19 at 08:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022, Zoltan Puskas wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [Please don't top-post.] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I've been using both repoman _and_ pkgcheck becasue I was not sure |
| 7 |
> > which |
| 8 |
> > one covers all the checks I need to make. In fact [Pull Requests |
| 9 |
> > wiki](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:GitHub/Pull_requests) has |
| 10 |
> > a |
| 11 |
> > big red warning box with the following message, and I quote: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > "CI is not an excuse not to run repoman full, at least for the |
| 14 |
> > packages |
| 15 |
> > being committed." |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> That warning box also says: "Furthermore, pkgcheck is imperfect (yet |
| 18 |
> very fast) and may fail to notice some subtle breakages (especially if |
| 19 |
> USE flag masking/forcing) is involved." |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Looks like the warning was added by mgorny in 2016 [1]. Have these |
| 22 |
> issues with pkgcheck been fixed in the meantime? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Yes, I think all the blockers were fixed since. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Michał Górny |
Archives