1 |
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:20:29 +0000 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| the policy i consider a no-brainer, fix TEXTRELs |
4 |
|
5 |
So... Say libfoo is a library that decodes files in the foo format. Say |
6 |
also that libfoo-2.1 is currently marked stable, and does not contain |
7 |
any TEXTRELs, but only supports foo files using the foo-1 format, which |
8 |
is rapidly becoming obsolete. Then, if libfoo-2.2 comes along, and |
9 |
introduces support for the rapidly becoming very widely used foo-2 |
10 |
format, should libfoo-2.2 be held back from being marked stable purely |
11 |
because of a TEXTREL? |
12 |
|
13 |
What about if, instead, libfoo-2.1 contains a security bug that is |
14 |
fixed by libfoo-2.2? |
15 |
|
16 |
What about if, instead, libfoo-2.1 has a nasty bug that will cause it |
17 |
to lose data under certain circumstances? |
18 |
|
19 |
See, any policy on TEXTRELs will have to be *very* carefully worded to |
20 |
avoid having people think that they're something important... Otherwise |
21 |
we'll end up with broken packages being left in stable simply because |
22 |
newer versions contain TEXTRELs. Don't overhype the problem -- make it |
23 |
clear that it's a "would be nice" issue, or else you'll encourage even |
24 |
more superstition than we have already... |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
28 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
29 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |