Archives
Archives
| From: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:57:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 499D3B2C.3060601@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prepalldocs implementation in eutils.eclass (was: prepalldocs is now banned) by "Tiziano Müller" |
||
| 1 | Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 | > The only problem I see here is that either <OLDLOCATION> or ${T}/doc |
| 3 | > contains subdirs. So my proposal for the next EAPI is to allow dodoc and |
| 4 | > newdoc to operate on dirs. Which also gives the benefit to reduce this |
| 5 | > idiom: |
| 6 | > insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF} |
| 7 | > doins -r examples |
| 8 | > to: |
| 9 | > dodoc examples |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > Your comments? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | I like the idea, not sure if dodoc could take an -r or just accept |
| 15 | automatically directories. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | lu |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Luca Barbato |
| 22 | Gentoo Council Member |
| 23 | Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 24 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |