| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:03:10PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: |
| 2 |
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in: |
| 4 |
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html |
| 5 |
> > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there. |
| 6 |
> > Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness, |
| 7 |
> > then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file. |
| 8 |
> Very good point, thanks. But the changes of GLEP 46 can't be validated |
| 9 |
> without allowing the "status" attribute for the toplevel maintainer. But I |
| 10 |
> guess we could do it as long as it's documented (and commented) correctly. |
| 11 |
Sure. In other places where DTD->XSD migrations have been done, there |
| 12 |
ARE still changes made to the DTD for new elements/attributes etc. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
| 17 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 18 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives