Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jerry A! <jerry@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PGCC
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:00:34
Message-Id: 20010219140058.A21535@kabbu.akopia.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] PGCC by 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
1 On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:41:11PM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
2 : "Jerry A!" wrote:
3 :
4 : > . commented out A1..A2 patches sections in src_unpack(). Will also be
5 : > removed pending commit.
6 :
7 : Make these patches problems with pgcc? I removed a few other patches which
8 : made it in 2.95.2.1 but these
9 : where not in 2.95.2.1. Thats why they are still there.
10
11 I don't think that these patches will present a problem with pgcc. The
12 reason I commented them out was b/c they didn't even get downloaded when
13 I did an "ebuild ... fetch"
14
15 : > Is there any reason we don't build the texinfo docs?
16 :
17 : ? We build texinfo docs but we don't build texinfo because we have a separate
18 : package for that.
19
20 Okay, that's all I needed to know.
21
22 : I just commited my lates version of gcc 2.95.2.1-r1 which uses the "use
23 : build" if you compile for sys-build
24 : (in this case texinfo gets build).
25 : Should I merge it with your one or can you do it?
26
27 I'll be happy to take care of the merge. I want to do some more testing
28 and I wanted to make sure that the way I was going about this is okay
29 with you.
30
31 --Jerry
32
33 name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
34 phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death...
35 email: jerry@×××××××.org || ...It's much more important
36 || than that!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] PGCC 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)