| 1 |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:18:13 -0500 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:37:09 +0100 |
| 7 |
> > Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >> > media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be used as a more |
| 10 |
> >> > modern replacement. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Don't recommend mplayer2, afaik it's dead. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Also, I'd drop "modern" from there: I don't see much more modernity |
| 15 |
> > in those forks except maybe younger maintainers :) |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Is there an exhaustive list of packages that don't work with one or |
| 19 |
> the other? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
not really as ideally there shouldn't be any; mplayer is the most |
| 22 |
notable example, xbmc used to be but not sure these days |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> I suggest just cutting the subjective parts out of the last paragraph: |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Please also note that some packages support only one of the two |
| 27 |
> implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages will |
| 28 |
> result in blockers unless the user changes the global USE=libav |
| 29 |
> state. The most notable example of such package is |
| 30 |
> media-video/mplayer. media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be |
| 31 |
> used as replacements for users who prefer to use libav. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
yes that's what i meant, but also dropping mplayer2 from there too: |
| 36 |
http://git.mplayer2.org/mplayer2/ |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
even good old mplayer is much more actively maintained and evolving :) |
Archives