Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 08:21:08
Message-Id: 623652d50605050116u218e8783g598e39310a90b7c2@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? by Jakub Moc
1 On 05/05/06, Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
2 > Philip Webb wrote:
3 > > 060504 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
4 > >> If we followed others blindly, as so many users suggest,
5 > >> then we would have stabilized KDE 3.5 ages ago,
6 > >> and every single one of you KDE users would be complaining
7 > >> about how our QA sucks because KDE doesn't compile
8 > >> or breaks badly in so many places.
9 > >
10 > > This is rubbish: I'm now using 3.5.2 & have had no problems whatsoever;
11 > > nor did I have problems earlier with 3.5.0 & 3.5.1 .
12 > >
13 >
14 > Oh, sure it's complete rubbish... there are only ~40 bugs open right now
15 > about KDE 3.5 (on a quick and definitely incomplete search). The
16 > fixed/upstream ones would definitely be well over 100, don't have any
17 > good query for that.
18 >
19 > http://tinyurl.com/rg55l
20 >
21 > But yeah, you know better, no problems whatsoever. :P
22
23 KDE 3.4 has at least 31 open bugs on a quick and incomplete search.
24
25 http://tinyurl.com/mzzoo
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list