Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | ||
| Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:21:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38HLLwrvA_Dd1aPAinA2d_KJR7sESdJn-udTnJuHr+yMag@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Any repoman checks done at the time of each commit are essentially |
| 3 | > worthless. Consider this example: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Unless you're bisecting a change that was in those 6 months of |
| 6 | commits. You could introduce a problem in one commit and fix it in the |
| 7 | next and have intermediate breakage. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | But, like I said, maybe bisection isn't useful for the portage tree. |