Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 01:36:16
Message-Id: 5709ADFA.30106@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge by Rich Freeman
1 On 10/04/16 02:14, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > Part of me also wonders if Gentoo would be better off having emerge
3 > gentoo-sources actually BUILD the kernel and initramfs and not just
4 > dump a bunch of sources on the disk. Most distros consider an
5 > initramfs a no-brainer because it just ships already setup, and an
6 > initramfs is a lot more forgiving when you add a new drive and your
7 > firmware/kernel decides to re-number everything. Just label your
8 > filesystems or store UUIDs and the initramfs will figure out what
9 > happened.
10 >
11 I think that is the potential for a stage4-style install. I think
12 previous list discussions have maintained that the flexibility of gentoo
13 is maintained by having a very basic install image, and a stage3 to
14 bootstrap into, and have the user compile their own kernel.
15
16 Otherwise, go install debian/ubuntu/choose-your-own-ready-boxed-linux
17 ... gentoo isn't that kinda distro. Imho.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>