Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:15:12
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that by Gilles Dartiguelongue
Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:39 +0200 as

> Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit : [...] >> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage >> (openssl/libpng/libjpg), because it's genuinely useful, but I think it >> should be restricted to such important packages, or at least disabled >> by FEATURES="-preserve-libs". >> >> Ideally, these calls should either adhere to FEATURES="-preserve-libs", >> or there should be a tool that can identify which files portage has >> preserved, and allow easy rebuilding of dependent packages, and >> removal. >> At the moment, I'm having to manually grep ebuilds, ls the libraries >> and run revdep-rebuild over them one at a time... > > These sound like very good ideas to me.
++ If I have FEATURE=-preserve-libs, that's what I want. Exceptions should be limited to what will break the toolchain (including revdep-rebuild here, since that's what's normally used to get out of the situation) itself. If there was a way to handle it so a general revdep-rebuild run would still detect the preserved library as missing and do the necessary rebuilds, it'd be one thing, but if the libraries are there, it figures things are OK unless you've fed it that specific library, thereby making a general revdep-rebuld run useless at the very task it was designed to fix. Talking about which... What about creating an eutils (or whatever) function to handle the critical preservations, having it build a centralized list of them somewhere, and having a revdep-rebuild mode that will treat that list as if it had been fed in with --library on the command line? Make revdep-rebuild able to run this mode either on its own, or as part of an otherwise general run, and then you can have packages (or the package-manager itself, if it uses the list as well) preserve libs as they wish, without interfering with the ability of revdep- rebuild to detect and resolve the issues in a normal run. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>