Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | ||
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2007 23:07:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200705170104.53149.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages by Jakub Moc |
||
| 1 | While I always was for uniq package names, tree-wide, renaming doesn't solve |
| 2 | anything. Gentoo's binary packages are fundamentally broken. You can't have |
| 3 | two binary packages of the same ebuild differing e.g. in use flags, |
| 4 | architecture, toolchain, etc. pp. either. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Carsten |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |