1 |
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST) |
2 |
"Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all? That |
5 |
> Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to |
6 |
> essentially define what a Gentoo Package Manager should be? |
7 |
|
8 |
Gentoo, and any other parties, will have ample opportunity for input |
9 |
long before it gets finalised. Right now, though, soliciting comments |
10 |
from all and sundry will be more distracting than productive. We know |
11 |
it's currently incomplete and full of holes; we don't need to be told |
12 |
it. |
13 |
|
14 |
> >> Really, I find this weird and ambiguous and you should probably be |
15 |
> >> reinstated as a dev or be bumped off of PMS, which should be |
16 |
> >> managed by Gentoo developers only. |
17 |
|
18 |
If you want to make such a distinction, then it's managed by me, and I |
19 |
am a Gentoo developer. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are |
22 |
> talking about'. I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I |
23 |
> have a feeling you would disagree with me. |
24 |
|
25 |
The second requirement is an ability to work effectively with the other |
26 |
people writing it. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |