| 1 |
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST) |
| 2 |
"Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all? That |
| 5 |
> Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to |
| 6 |
> essentially define what a Gentoo Package Manager should be? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Gentoo, and any other parties, will have ample opportunity for input |
| 9 |
long before it gets finalised. Right now, though, soliciting comments |
| 10 |
from all and sundry will be more distracting than productive. We know |
| 11 |
it's currently incomplete and full of holes; we don't need to be told |
| 12 |
it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> >> Really, I find this weird and ambiguous and you should probably be |
| 15 |
> >> reinstated as a dev or be bumped off of PMS, which should be |
| 16 |
> >> managed by Gentoo developers only. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If you want to make such a distinction, then it's managed by me, and I |
| 19 |
am a Gentoo developer. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are |
| 22 |
> talking about'. I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I |
| 23 |
> have a feeling you would disagree with me. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The second requirement is an ability to work effectively with the other |
| 26 |
people writing it. |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives