Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:00:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130429215950.019cd23b@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:53:30 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > As you can see in the bug, we're not discussing anything related to |
| 4 | > > EAPI 0 behaviour, so this argument is irrelevant. We're discussing a |
| 5 | > > change in a later EAPI, where the change had nothing to say about |
| 6 | > > ordering. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > In the discussions that led to inclusion of the feature in EAPI 4, it |
| 9 | > was implicit that it would be possible to override the default. This |
| 10 | > can only work if "$@" goes after all default options. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | But that wasn't got approved by the Council... |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |