| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 05:21:02PM +0200, c.wegener@××××××××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
[portage in LDAP] |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> As directory services are optimized for read performance, there are |
| 6 |
> disadvantages for write access to a directory service. But compared to |
| 7 |
> the amount of user needing read access to a directory service the |
| 8 |
> number of write access updates should REALLY small. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I think your bad experience with LDAP as authentication service may |
| 11 |
> have to do with misconfiguration or lack of optimization. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I wonder how LDAP should have a better performance than rsync? |
| 14 |
Are there implementations that support compression while transmitting |
| 15 |
only the delta between entries? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I have next to no experience with directory services, so could you |
| 18 |
please outline a bit further why you think this is better than rsync |
| 19 |
or a database? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Yours sceptically, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Patrick |
Archives