| 1 |
El lun, 06-04-2015 a las 23:31 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 6 April 2015 at 23:07, Jason A. Donenfeld <zx2c4@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Packages that will compile against either one get "|| (openssl libressl)". |
| 4 |
> > Packages that require a specific one will just have that one listed. Openssl |
| 5 |
> > will block Libressl and vice versa. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Doesn't work, you'd have to rebuild *all* the packages built with one |
| 8 |
> or the other when switching, or (if the SONAME were the same) they |
| 9 |
> would be built against a different ABI that they are built against, |
| 10 |
> which can be possibly causing security issues as data structure size |
| 11 |
> (and thus meaning of the content) changes. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 14 |
> https://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Well, with the current approach for libav vs. ffmpeg (a USE flag for |
| 18 |
choosing the preferred option) it wouldn't be a problem as people will |
| 19 |
end up rebuilding the reverse deps when they switch to one or other |
| 20 |
alternative :/ |
Archives