1 |
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:14:21 -0400 |
2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On Thursday 12 June 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
> > On 04:11 Wed 11 Jun , Brian Harring wrote: |
5 |
> > > Reiterating the early request, I'd like the council to please |
6 |
> > > discuss the current status of PMS, |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > People actually working on the PMS would be better-placed to |
9 |
> > discuss its current status, if by that you mean progress toward an |
10 |
> > approved spec. The last I heard was a couple months ago when Ciaran |
11 |
> > asked us whether there were any further major issues and removed |
12 |
> > kdebuild-1 from the PDF to be approved. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to |
15 |
> happen |
16 |
|
17 |
No, I was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the version sent to the |
18 |
Council for approval. Doing so is just a case of toggling a switch in |
19 |
PMS. |
20 |
|
21 |
Also, until they were all mysteriously fired, Gentoo's KDE people were |
22 |
planning to ask the Council for official approval of kdebuild-1 so that |
23 |
it could remain in PMS. So that's still up in the air too. |
24 |
|
25 |
> > I'd like to know what's holding you back from contributing to it, |
26 |
> > instead of telling us that someone else is doing things you don't |
27 |
> > like. Is there some kind of technical barrier (like the TeX)? Or |
28 |
> > what? Are you filing bugs against the parts you don't like? What's |
29 |
> > happening to them? |
30 |
> |
31 |
> TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert |
32 |
> it to docbook and be done with this garbage. |
33 |
|
34 |
And docbook does integrate with Gentoo? Please point me to other Gentoo |
35 |
documentation that uses docbook. |
36 |
|
37 |
Also, I've yet to be told how to get automatic, verified, |
38 |
zero-work-upon-relocation cross-document links using either docbook or |
39 |
guidexml. Perhaps you'd care to explain. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Ciaran McCreesh |