| 1 |
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 03:21 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Now that we've established however that openssl could compile with only |
| 3 |
> a perl interpreter and none of the modules, we shouldn't have any |
| 4 |
> dependancies in the other direction either? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Once I find a general consensus on whether we need 2 ebuilds or one with |
| 7 |
useflag, right. Even as I type this though I realize that it might impose |
| 8 |
complications on the livecd/catalyst/whatchamacallit maintainers if they have |
| 9 |
to use a minimal flag for only one package in a set when building a stage1+. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 14 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
| 15 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
| 16 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
Archives