Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:12:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130430121213.330244bc@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:30:03 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 | > There's value in someone being just contrarian enough to purposefully |
| 4 | > look for the strangest or most illogical read of a spec and |
| 5 | > (initially) implement it that way, in ordered to root out and get the |
| 6 | > bugs in the spec fixed. That said... |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I highly doubt the person implementing the code for Paludis was doing |
| 9 | it in a contrarian way. As far as I can see, he simply implemented what |
| 10 | the spec says. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |