Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:15:40
Message-Id: 53D39C34.8000707@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status by Pacho Ramos
1 On 07/26/14 07:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
2 > El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 13:57 +0200, Manuel Rüger escribió:
3 > [...]
4 >> +1 from ruby.
5 >>
6 >> How do we solve keyword requests?
7 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477648 is ~ 12 months and hasn't
8 >> seen any reply from the ppc* teams.
9 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497396 ~ 6 months
10 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487206 ~ 9 months
11 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487178 ~ 9 months
12 >>
13 >> We can start dropping ppc* from dev-ruby/* if that eases maintenance and
14 >> gives you more time for core packages?
15 >>
16 >> Cheers
17 >> Manuel
18 >>
19 > I guess once we free ppc* teams from all the load from stabilizations
20 > they will likely fix much sooner keyword requests. What I would do is to
21 > fix the stabilizations first and, if still unable to handle keyword
22 > requests, try to resolve that one :)
23 >
24 >
25 Yes, I've said somewhere on this list that I'm willing to help
26 stabilizatoin on ppc/ppc64 but only for core packages. Again because I
27 do create ppc stages3 for uclibc and soon musl and its a pain to have to
28 do what I do for mips.
29
30 Let's do this right and make it the model for all minor arches.
31
32 --
33 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
34 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
35 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
36 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
37 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA