Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:07:03
1 Underlying the draft code of conduct is an assumption that aggressive
2 and less-than-nice behavior on gentoo-dev is seriously harming Gentoo.
3 On the other hand, LKML is famous for its flamewars, and nobody claims
4 that Linux is in serious trouble. Does anybody have a good feeling for
5 where the difference lies? Are we sure that we're solving the right
6 problem? (That's not a rhetorical question; I really don't know the
7 answer.)
9 -g2boojum-
10 --
11 Grant Goodyear
12 Gentoo Developer
13 g2boojum@g.o
15 GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev vs lkml? Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev vs lkml? Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev vs lkml? Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@××××××××.org>