| 1 |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:23:31 +0800 |
| 2 |
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 03/24/2013 09:40 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> The masks are sort of announcements as you have 30 days to revert |
| 7 |
> >> that decision. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > You don't seem to recognize the quite significant psychological |
| 10 |
> > impact of you having already made the decision, compared to, say, |
| 11 |
> > having an actually inclusive package removal process. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If the package has been "rotting away" with open bugs in bugzilla for |
| 14 |
> weeks or months and no one cares ... what are we supposed to do? Wait |
| 15 |
> a bit longer? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In short, mask it, wait until it rots completely and _then_ apply 30 day |
| 18 |
removal policy. Unmask it, if it finds a maintainer and bugs are fixed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Robert |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Róbert Èeròanský |
| 25 |
E-mail: openhs@×××××××××.com |
| 26 |
Jabber: hs@××××××.sk |
Archives