Archives
Archives
| From: | "Jannik Glückert" <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Sam James <sam@g.o>, Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, toolchain@g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:55:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAFqe=z+hDbGW0BJe24a2S--ZVMXkWxVoKVcuSqvCSBEX3F+akg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | This is not for stripping flags, it's for detecting a flag and e.g. |
| 2 | changing the configure invocation accordingly. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | E.g. libreoffice has |
| 5 | is-flagq "-flto*" && myeconfargs+=( --enable-lto ) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Am Mo., 27. Juni 2022 um 16:51 Uhr schrieb Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>: |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:04 AM Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 | > > |
| 11 | > > From: Jannik Glückert <jannik.glueckert@×××××.com> |
| 12 | > > |
| 13 | > > Handle bits like -flto -fno-lto. |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > Why would we care about this? If we just strip the -flto out, that |
| 16 | > leaves -fno-lto and the result is the same. |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > What am I missing? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] flag-o-matic.eclass: have is-flagq respect succeeding -fno-flag | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |