1 |
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:12:24 -0500 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Francesco R. <vivo75@×××××.com> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > long story short |
8 |
> > having a portage-20130126.tar.bz2 snapshot (before the EAPI 5 |
9 |
> > switch) greatly simplified the upgrade of an old server on a client. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Why not keep a copy on the servers? I mean |
12 |
> > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/snapshots/ |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Going back in time with portage is the easy part - it is in CVS. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> The real problem is all the distfiles themselves, especially things |
18 |
> like out-of-tree patch tarballs hosted by devs. |
19 |
|
20 |
The mirroring system could be adjusted to keep around @system distfiles |
21 |
for a longer time, or alternatively snapshot them when the above |
22 |
snapshot is made; which should be able to solve this problem. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
With kind regards, |
26 |
|
27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
28 |
Gentoo Developer |
29 |
|
30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |