Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed | ||
| Date: | Sun, 03 Sep 2017 21:22:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | b4358bc0-9020-5a6a-a3e2-ddad6a76b04d@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed by Chris Mayo |
||
| 1 | On 09/03/2017 11:56 AM, Chris Mayo wrote: |
| 2 | > # |
| 3 | > # The following snippet would suggest app-misc/foo for optional foo support, |
| 4 | > # app-misc/bar or app-misc/baz[bar] for optional bar support |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Would the @EXAMPLE tag[0] make sense here? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | [0] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed | Chris Mayo <aklhfex@×××××.com> |