Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Syroid <tom@×××××××××××.com>
To: Kevin Hayes <kjhaze@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] procps-2.0.7-r6 sandbox violation
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:07:33
Message-Id: 264524075.1033056187@[192.168.1.101]
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] procps-2.0.7-r6 sandbox violation by Kevin Hayes
1 OK Kevin... thanks for that. I didn't think to check the buglist as I
2 hadn't seen any commentary on the user list regarding this problem.
3
4 I did manage to overcome the "show-stopper" status, however.
5
6 I,
7 * kept running emerge -p system
8 * emerged each package individually, excluding procps
9 * finished off the build
10 * brought up the system
11 * then 'emerge system'
12 * and procps then built without the violation
13
14 Best,
15 /tom
16
17 --On Friday, September 27, 2002 6:57 +1000 Kevin Hayes <kjhaze@×××××.com>
18 wrote:
19
20 > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:55:37 -0600
21 > Tom Syroid <tom@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
22 >
23 >> Damn. Broke a perfect record. In 8 months of installing Gentoo, I've yet
24 >> to have a problem building the base system...
25 >>
26 >> Clean install of 1.4-rc1
27 >> I've sync'd and rsync'd several times, but the problem remains
28 >>
29 >> The system is trying to build procps-2.0.7-r6 and dies with a sandbox
30 >> violation. While I've heard of this error before, I've never personally
31 >> experienced it so I'm at a loss at to what to do.
32 >>
33 >> The /tmp errorlog show:
34 >>
35 >> unlink: /var/catman/cat1/ps.1.gz
36 >> unlink: /var/man/cat1/ps.1.gz
37 >>
38 >> Guidance appreciated.
39 >>
40 >> Best,
41 >> /tom
42 >
43 > See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8390
44 >
45 > --
46 > Kevin Hayes