Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:39:03
Message-Id: 4F9DD0E7.90403@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 by Zac Medico
1 On 29/04/12 15:40, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > Maybe it's reasonable for the initramfs to utilize a config file from
3 > /etc of the future root filesystem, but having in depend on files from
4 > the future /usr seems like a strange idea. Wouldn't it make more sense
5 > to bundle all dependencies into the initramfs, so that it's mostly
6 > self-contained, rather than have it be dependent on files from the
7 > future root filesystem (or future /usr)?
8
9 Well it is a bit unreasonable even rely on foreign /etc.
10
11 The root problem is that what you want to use for early boot should not
12 have huge deps and that assumption fails for a number of reasons, I
13 guess mostly due the fact who writes some software doesn't expect it to
14 be run on early boot =\
15
16 lu
17
18 --
19
20 Luca Barbato
21 Gentoo/linux
22 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero