Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:06:00
Message-Id: 1122821961.12566.30.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles by Chris Gianelloni
1 On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:11 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
2 > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
3 > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
4 > stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
5 > not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux,
6 > as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles
7 > are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles
8 > are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd.
9
10 Standard Hardened Glibc:
11 - amd64 (valid)
12 - ppc (valid)
13 - ppc64 (valid)
14 - x86 (valid)
15 - x86/2.6 (valid)
16
17 Embedded/uClibc:
18 - arm (valid)
19 - arm/2.4 (valid)
20 - arm/armeb (valid)
21 - arm/armeb/2.4 (valid)
22
23 - mips (valid)
24 - mips/hardened (valid)
25 - mips/mipsel (valid)
26 - mips/mipsel/hardened (valid)
27
28 - ppc (valid)
29 - ppc/hardened (valid)
30
31 - x86 (valid)
32 - x86/2.4 (valid)
33 - x86/hardened (valid)
34 - x86/hardened/2.4 (valid)
35 - x86/linux24 (deprecated)
36 - x86/linux26 (deprecated)
37
38 > Thanks,
39 >
40 > --
41 > Chris Gianelloni
42 > Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
43 > Games - Developer
44 > Gentoo Linux
45
46
47 --
48 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
49
50 --
51 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>