1 |
Alistair Bush wrote: |
2 |
> ++. I actually have no problem with agreeing with it, currently my |
3 |
> problem is the complete and utter lack of any _planned_ upgrade path. |
4 |
> What do we think users are going to be saying at the end of the year |
5 |
> when after every sync they have to revdep-rebuild. Maybe, if we proceed |
6 |
> with this, we investigate what can have its la files removed and do it |
7 |
> all in one go. therefore ppl won't have to rebuild kde/gnome ( or any |
8 |
> other large and time consuming package) over and over and over and over |
9 |
> and over and over ....... again. Hell it would even be better to |
10 |
> "batch" a few conversions so that each revdep-rebuild fixes multiple |
11 |
> breakages in one. |
12 |
|
13 |
Call that an experiment, do not start screaming but just try to help a bit. |
14 |
|
15 |
I think we could have those change masked now and unmasked once we got |
16 |
something sorted better. |
17 |
|
18 |
lu |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
|
22 |
Luca Barbato |
23 |
Gentoo Council Member |
24 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
25 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |