1 |
Mike Auty schrieb: |
2 |
>> Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning that |
3 |
>> the sys-fs/zfs package is potentially broken. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> This seems like a sure-fire way to make users paranoid and/or |
6 |
> desensitized? People will learn to ignore warnings if we make them big |
7 |
> red and flashing but then say they're only potential breakages (and they |
8 |
> subsequently discover that most everything runs fine). If they learn to |
9 |
> ignore big red flashing warnings it'll be more difficult when they're |
10 |
> not potential breakages but actual ones we've accurately identified... |
11 |
|
12 |
Maybe "big fat warning" was a bit of an overstatement. I meant the same kind |
13 |
of notice that @preserved-rebuild set produces today. Or the "configuration |
14 |
files need updating" message. |
15 |
|
16 |
Much like the aforementioned, the affected package might continue to work |
17 |
totally fine, or be broken in subtle ways. It might bother the user enough to |
18 |
report a bug, but hopefully not enough to turn them away from Gentoo. |
19 |
|
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |