Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

[Alex Roman]

Hi

I took the time to update the ebuild for gnusim8085 :) I created bug #121544 and I uploaded a .patch (diffed against the latest ebuild in the portage 
tree).

Even before I got to add the dependency to the modular xorg-x11 bug, withing a matter of seconds someone already added the dependency (or was it 
automatic?). Anyway, I'm impressed.

So, I'd like some non-gnome people to test it, and make sure I got the deps all right. The application is a gtk2/gnome application and it _will_ 
install libgnomeui (it needs gnome.h).


Alex Roman.

Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> The last change: 343 to 329 -- pretty decent, but I'd like to see about
> 1.5-2x this rate. Pretty soon I'll have to change the list of the worst
> offenders to the top 10 instead of 10 packages, because the number of
> actual herds is getting pretty small.
>
> Progress graph:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
>
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060203
>
> Herds with 10 or more unported packages, and change in # of packages:
>
>      91 games (-3)
>      58 none (individual or no maintainer) (-2)
>      32 (no metadata.xml) (-0)
>      27 desktop-wm (-3)
>      22 cjk (-0)
>      14 video (-0)
>
> IRC: #gentoo-x
>
> Documentation:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/porting-modular-x-howto.xml
>
> Metabug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/112675
>
> If you can't figure out what needs to get done and you've already read
> the docs, ask in #gentoo-x.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list