Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:21:54
Message-Id: 20020801231758.696fb9c1.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1 by Rob Kaper
1 begin quote
2 On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:39:05 +0200
3 Rob Kaper <rkaper@×××.nl> wrote:
4
5 > On Thursday 01 August 2002 15:35, Terje Kvernes wrote:
6 > > if the checksum differ, which it would have, emerge will abort.
7 > > although, emerge logs do sound like a very good idea.
8 >
9 > For optimum security, emerge should check checksums from different
10 > locations. One or two trusted servers (often even the same as the one
11 > where the files reside, although that might not be true for gentoo)
12 > can be compromised too easily.
13 >
14 > Rob
15 >
16 actually portage compares to the one in the portage tree, which is
17 concidered "safe" as its not related to the servers where the binaries
18 are located.
19
20 //Spider
21
22
23 --
24 begin .signature
25 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
26 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
27 end