| 1 |
Dnia 2015-03-23, o godz. 13:22:25 |
| 2 |
Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few |
| 5 |
> pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc |
| 6 |
> that don't fall into any current herds. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting experiment if we |
| 9 |
> had a collaborative herd (probably named "collab") that signals the |
| 10 |
> status that anyone is generally free to fix, bump, or do sane things to |
| 11 |
> the pkgs with the caveat that you fix what you break. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Anyone else interested in such a setup? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Don't abuse herds when you can easily add new data to metadata.xml. |
| 16 |
In fact, you can store much more useful information there rather than |
| 17 |
some dumb on/off switch. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That said, we would use some 'best practices' page on the wiki. Say, |
| 20 |
I don't mind others bumping my packages as long as they compare |
| 21 |
configure.ac & Makefile.am between revisions. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
Archives