| 1 |
Le vendredi 12 mars 2010 à 16:59 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:46:34 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> [...] |
| 6 |
> > That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not |
| 7 |
> > wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that |
| 8 |
> > all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and |
| 9 |
> > adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages |
| 10 |
> > who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a |
| 11 |
> > long time ago, but it's never too late. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Or like the old gtk-1: completely abandon the package and let the |
| 14 |
> consumers upgrade slowly. IMHO this is the less annoying approach for |
| 15 |
> everyone. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Well the discussion about dropping glib-1 and gtk-1 pops up once in a |
| 18 |
while in the herd. The removal hasn't been done yet because we focus |
| 19 |
more on packages that pops most on bugzilla for example. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 23 |
Gentoo |
Archives