1 |
Dne středa 14 Říjen 2009 13:19:42 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a): |
2 |
> [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, |
6 |
> > we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was |
7 |
> > synced with some developer overlay, or when a Great Unveiling was done |
8 |
> > after limited, private, small scale testing (as with many GNOME and KDE |
9 |
> > releases, not to point the finger). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If GNOME is involved, I would like you to point some fingers and tell |
12 |
> us exactly where you think we went wrong; exactly which "Great |
13 |
> Unveiling" are you talking about? If you don't tell us what we did |
14 |
> wrong, you surely can't expect us to fix the problem :) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> All GNOME releases are incremental, so in 99% of the cases, the |
17 |
> migration path is straightforward. If as an hppa arch dev, if you were |
18 |
> inconvenienced, we would like to correct the problem since it would've |
19 |
> definitely affected other archs too (and we know how understaffed you |
20 |
> guys are :) |
21 |
> |
22 |
Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into the tree |
23 |
as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree right away when we had |
24 |
working configuration. |
25 |
|
26 |
But aparently thats not enough... |