| 1 |
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built |
| 3 |
> with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+= -fbounds-checking as a |
| 4 |
> basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it |
| 5 |
> anywhere the chances of it being audited are slim to none and |
| 6 |
> -fbounds-checking helps ferret out alot of common coding mistakes. |
| 7 |
> gcc-3.4.4 works good for this. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I am still on gcc-3.3.x - will that work for this test? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sincerely, |
| 12 |
Brix |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
| 15 |
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Archives