1 |
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:01:26AM -0500, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > > + In news item format ``>2.0``, this field is mandatory. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I think it should not be mandatory, for the purpose of the tools |
6 |
> > dealing with news items. So I'd simply say here: "Only in news item |
7 |
> > format 2.1 or later." |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> |
10 |
> My concern is that if it isn't mandatory; we will end up with the same |
11 |
> problem. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> No one will set expiry headers on their items and we will be forced to go |
14 |
> back and update old news items to add them once |
15 |
> there are too many items (today's state.) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Alternatively we could simply state amend the glep to have a default expiry |
18 |
> (say 3y) and if no expires header is present we consume the Posted header |
19 |
> for this purpose. |
20 |
|
21 |
If we have a default expiration, it should be one year after the date |
22 |
posted to go along with our current policy of not supporting things that |
23 |
are older than a year. |
24 |
|
25 |
William |