Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:01:14
Message-Id: 20041013090106.7e2fe14b.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 begin quote
2 On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:31:47 -0700
3 "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
4
5
6 First off, Congratulations for your Satire, Ciaran. Been reading much
7 of Mark Twain lately?
8
9
10 > For real benefits, reducing the number of files, or using a filesystem
11 > that performs tail packing reduces the amount of disk seek that must
12 > be done, really increases performance given the number of small files.
13
14
15 Well, here's another method ;)
16
17 /root/portage.img on /usr/portage type ext2 (rw,noatime,loop=/dev/loop0)
18 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 293M Oct 12 23:17 /root/portage.img
19 /root/portage.img 257M 195M 62M 77% /usr/portage
20
21
22 some varied interesting things from tune2fs -l
23 Filesystem features: dir_index sparse_super
24 Inode count: 300144
25 Block count: 300000
26 Free blocks: 62825
27 Free inodes: 154512
28 Block size: 1024
29 Fragment size: 1024
30
31
32 //Spider
33
34
35 --
36 begin .signature
37 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
38 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
39 end

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>