| 1 |
Naresh Donti wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> The snapshot I used had gcc-2.95.2 on it. Will wait for the latest |
| 4 |
> snapshot and try again. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Just upgrade gcc to 2.95.3 and downgrade automake to 1.4 if you used the |
| 7 |
snapshot from 20010421 if you used the one from 20010405 you should use |
| 8 |
the |
| 9 |
next snapshot. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
BTW: jikes is on cvs now :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
bye achim |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> >From: AGottinger@××××××××.de (Achim Gottinger) |
| 17 |
> >Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 18 |
> >To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 19 |
> >Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] First ebuild file - jikes |
| 20 |
> >Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:36:22 +0200 |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> >Naresh Donti wrote: |
| 23 |
> > > |
| 24 |
> > > gcc-2.95.3 is in the tree, but it is not the default in |
| 25 |
> > > sys-i686-20010421-r1.tbz2 that I used to install this system. It has |
| 26 |
> > > gcc-2.95.2. Maybe achim's next snapshot sys.tbz2 should have |
| 27 |
> >gcc-2.95.3. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> >Hi Naresh, |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> >Are you sure you used -r1? I used 2.95.2 in 20010421 that's why I |
| 32 |
> >uploaded r1 a few hours later. |
| 33 |
> >If your build requires automake, try to downgrade automake-1.4d to 1.4 |
| 34 |
> >found a few quirks here while testing with 1.4d. |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> >bye achim |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> >_______________________________________________ |
| 39 |
> >gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 40 |
> >gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 41 |
> >http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> _________________________________________________________________ |
| 44 |
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 47 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 48 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 49 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives