| 1 |
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:49 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I suppose that we could do it both ways. The repoman check would be |
| 4 |
> for people who want a practical approach that doesn't require all |
| 5 |
> ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5, and your strict die approach would |
| 6 |
> be for people who want strictness and can afford to wait for the |
| 7 |
> relevant ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
But there's no way the repoman check is going to give anything like |
| 10 |
reliable answers if you're involving eclasses... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives