1 |
Peter Hjalmarsson posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:54:23 +0100 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I have start to question why should we care about overlays more then the |
4 |
> actual portage tree? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Take for example the kernel or Xorg. |
7 |
> They give themselves a period of time to clean up their own code (i.e. |
8 |
> kernel-modules, xorg-drivers) and then they release it as stable and |
9 |
> tell users/distributors to upgrade. |
10 |
> They do not wait for nVidia/AMD/other out-of-tree drivers/modules to |
11 |
> catch up. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Now if we say we have someone managing an overlay, and this person do |
14 |
> miss this warning/die for half an year, then I would say they have nott |
15 |
> done their homework and they are on their own. I do not see why we |
16 |
> should wait unreasonable long periods of time because there may be |
17 |
> someone broken somewhere. |
18 |
|
19 |
While I didn't mention overlays in my earlier reply, that's exactly why I |
20 |
proposed four months each in warning and die, before removal altogether. |
21 |
That gives the once-per-quarter updaters a bit of extra time to catch it |
22 |
at each stage, and if they've not done so by four or even eight months |
23 |
out... waiting a full year, or two, or three... isn't necessarily going to |
24 |
help matters much. |
25 |
|
26 |
Besides, if they're /that/ far behind the main tree, what sort of overlay |
27 |
maintainer are they anyway? Hardly one that should be basing on Gentoo, |
28 |
which has always been a "rolling" distribution. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
32 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
33 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |