Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:06:20
Message-Id: 200807270004.12179.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Carsten Lohrke
1 2008-07-27 00:00:55 Carsten Lohrke napisał(a):
2 > On Samstag, 26. Juli 2008, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
3 > > > Um, this already is the policy. We've always fixed bug reports about
4 > > > LDFLAGS being ignored.
5 > >
6 > > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that this
7 > > policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about LDFLAGS being
8 > > ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal enacting of this policy.
9 >
10 > Afaik it has always been the way that *sane* LDFLAGS are to be respected, but
11 > exceptions exist of course and it's up to the maintainer to mangle or clear
12 > your LDFLAGS, if deemed necessary. I'd like to know, why Mark asked to bring
13 > this question up here. Shouldn't this be common sense!?
14
15 +1.
16
17 --
18 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature